Author: dfmines

submitted by /u/tomiwa1a [link] [comments]

This could be huge. Intel plans to enter the Bitcoin mining space with a cleverly marketed “ultra-low-voltage energy-efficient” ASIC chip. Considering that the chip shortage severely delayed the next generation of ASIC miners, this is tremendous. And, more importantly, it opens up the door for Bitcoin miners manufacturing in the USA. And in the rest of the Western world, even.  Related Reading | Why Did China Ban Bitcoin Mining? Here Are The Seven Leading Theories In December, Raja Koduri hinted at Intel’s intention to get into the Bitcoin mining space. Even though he’s the chief architect and senior vice president of Intel’s architecture, graphics and software division, no one expected Intel to deliver so soon.  Intel jumping into the #Bitcoin mining ASIC manufacturing is a huge. We need way more chip fab in the USA. It will result in: – Improved National Security– Supply Chain robustness And it will also result in less reliance on Taiwan, who is being threatened by China aggression. — Dennis Porter (@Dennis_Porter_) January 18, 2022 Details are scarce. There’s nothing on Intel’s official site. A quick search reveals that “Access to additional search results for “bonanza” is restricted”. However, we have the 411 on the project that goes by the code name “Bonanza Mine.” What Do We Know About Intel ’s “Bonanza Mine”? The product will be an “ultra-low-voltage energy-efficient Bitcoin mining ASIC.” According to Tom’s Hardware, the page that broke the news, Intel will reveal their new chip at: “The ISSCC conference is a yearly gathering of the best and brightest minds in the chip industry. This year, Intel has a presentation scheduled in the ‘Highlighted Chip Releases’ category to outline a new “Bonanza Mine” processor, a new chip described as an “ultra-low-voltage energy-efficient Bitcoin mining ASIC.” Apparently, Intel has been developing the product since at least 2018, when they registered “a patent for a specialized processing system that uses an optimized SHA-256 datapath.”According to Tom’s Hardware, “Intel has a wealth of experience in hardware-assisted SHA-256 algorithms due to the use of these instructions in its CPU products.”  This is huge news! More competition in the hardware mining sector is welcome 🔥 pic.twitter.com/C7I1FQJxH6 — Dan Held (@danheld) January 18, 2022 A more recent indication of the company’s intentions came when the already mentioned Intel executive Raja Koduri “appeared on popular streamer Dr. Lupo’s show.” He told him point-blank: “Being able to do much more efficient blockchain validation at a much lower cost, much lower power, is a pretty solvable problem. And you know, we are working on that, and at some point in time, hopefully not too far into the future, we will kinda share some interesting hardware for that.” BTC price chart for 01/18/2022 on Bitstamp | Source: BTC/USD on TradingView.com Why Is This Development Important? Until now, ASIC Bitcoin miners manufacturing is controlled by Bitmain and Microbt, with Canaan, Strongu, and Ebang handling a minority of the market. All of those companies are Chinese. The chips are all made in Taiwan and South Korea. This poses a centralization problem for the Bitcoin network that seemed unsolvable until Intel’s soft announcement. Now, the open-source Bitcoin miner that Jack Dorsey’s Block is working on makes a lot more sense. Theoretically, the silicon chip is the only part of an ASIC machine that can’t be bought in a hardware store. With that problem solved, by no less than an industry leader with immense manufacturing power, the sky’s the limit. If this whole thing materializes, expect a huge leap forward in the further decentralization of Bitcoin mining.  Intel, a $220 billion industry leader, is preparing to launch ASIC hardware for bitcoin mining. Bitcoin is a computer network. Every technology company will eventually plug themselves into it. https://t.co/pbTFiRqx0B — Pomp 🌪 (@APompliano) January 18, 2022 Also, Intel’s announcement certainly legitimizes Bitcoin mining as a business to watch for the next 100 years. As podcaster Anthony Pompliano said, “Bitcoin is a computer network. Every technology company will eventually plug themselves into it.” With this announcement, Bitcoin not only gets Intel’s seal of approval. The giant company now has skin in the game.  Related Reading | Intel, Microsoft Took 10+ Years to See Gains, Crypto Investors in Good Position To close this off, let’s quote Tom’s Hardware one more time: “For now, it isn’t clear if Intel will release the Bonanza Mine chip as a product for the public or if it remains confined to a research project. However, given that the chip is in the “highlighted Chip Releases: Digital/ML” track and Koduri’s comments, it’s logical to expect that these chips will be offered to customers in the near future.” So, everything we said is not a done deal just yet. It smells good, though. Featured Image by Badar ul islam Majid on Unsplash | Charts by TradingView

submitted by /u/Funkoma [link] [comments]

While the crypto economy has shed more than 3% in fiat value during the last 24 hours dropping to $2.09 trillion, the top rebase tokens by market capitalization have seen significant losses this week. At the time of writing, the rebase token economy is valued at over $3.2 billion but has lost more than 10% […]

As you all know, Youtube removed dislikes and it's harder to know if a video is scam or not. Before youtube removed dislikes, we could understand if a video is legit or scam by it's dislike ratio. Now it has become impossible to determine. Now you need to be 10x more careful of possible scam…
Read more

submitted by /u/ThatNaimish1 [link] [comments]

Is gas fees going down ETH is looking terrible right now. submitted by /u/Ok_Guitar_6653 [link] [comments]

A smart contract upgrade and newly integrated masternodes have given MNW fresh bullish momentum, possibly setting the project up for success in 2022.

I read the post about the merge not significantly reducing gas fees because the block time will go down from 13 sec. -> 12 sec. If that's true, how will the base layer scale to 1,000TPS if there will only be 1 execution shard? Won't it process the same number of transactions even if data…
Read more